The Legal Capacities of the United Nations General Assembly to Reduce or Neutralize the Veto Power of the Security Council

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Associate Prof., Department of Public Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

2 PhD Student in Public International Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran, Aras International Campus, Iran.

Abstract
The General Assembly of the United Nations, as one of the main organs of the organization, plays a vital role in addressing global crises and threats. This body can utilize certain legal powers to take action when the Security Council, due to the use of the veto or lack of agreement among its permanent members, is unable to make necessary decisions. One of the most important tools for the General Assembly in this context is the "Uniting for Peace" resolution, which allows the Assembly to take decisions in urgent situations to maintain international peace and security. This resolution is particularly significant in crises where immediate intervention is required to prevent the escalation of war or global threats. This article, while examining the powers of the General Assembly, concludes that if these powers are effectively utilized and coordinated with other United Nation bodies, they can serve as a valuable tool for overcoming the veto power and maintaining international peace and security.

Keywords

Subjects

1.      علیزاده، حمید؛ نیکخواه سرنقی، رضا؛ جوادی، محمد حسن؛ و اصفهانی، سید حسام. (۱۴۰۳). شورای امنیت؛ از تقابل حافظان صلح و امنیت بین‌المللی تا ناقضان حقوق بشر. مطالعات حقوق بشر اسلامی، ۱۳(۳)، ۶۱-۷۸.
2.      رجب‌زاده، آرام. (۱۴۰۰). نقش مجمع عمومی سازمان ملل متحد در استقرار صلح با تأکید بر قطعنامه اتحاد برای صلح. مقالات سومین کنفرانس بین‌المللی صلح‌پژوهی.
3.      کریمی‌نژاد، مرتضی. (۱۳۹۵). نقش مجمع عمومی در نظام ملل متحد. تهران: نشر میزان.
4.      لطفی گماسانی، محسن. (۱۳۹۸). اعمال حق وتو در نقض‌های شدید حقوق بین‌الملل بشر با تأکید بر مناقشه فلسطین. تهران: انتشارات حقوق یار.
5.     ملکشاهی، حسن؛ آزادبخت، فرهاد؛ و غضنفری، هوشنگ. (۱۴۰۱). مدل‌های حقوقی حاکمیت قانون با تمرکز بر حق وتو اعضای دائم شورای امنیت. فصلنامه مطالعات بین‌المللی، ۱۹(۲)، ۱۷۹-۱۹۴. https://doi.org/10.22034/isj.2022.306003.1609
6.      موسى‌زاده، رضا؛ و کوهی، ابراهیم. (۱۳۸۹). حقوق سازمان‌های بین‌المللی: حقوق شورای امنیت. تهران: انتشارات میزان.
1.      Bailey, Sydney Dawson. (1994). The procedure of the UN Security Council. Clarendon Press.
2.      Bajpai, Kanti. (2009). The United Nations and its work: Reform, democracy, and accountability. Oxford University Press, pp. 125130.
3.      Barber, Richard J. (2022). The powers of the UN General Assembly to prevent and respond to atrocity crimes. The University of Queensland.
4.      Bosco, David. (2009). Five to rule them all: The UN Security Council and the making of the modern world. Oxford University Press.
5.      Boyle, Alan, & Chinkin, Christine. (2007). The making of international law. Oxford University Press.
6.      Brierly, James Leslie. (1963). The law of nations: An introduction to the international law of peace. Oxford University Press.
7.      Chesterman, Simon. (2011). Legality vs. legitimacy: Humanitarian intervention, the Security Council, and the rule of law. Security Dialogue, 31(2), 143157.
8.      Daws, Sam. (1996). The United Nations and the Security Council. Oxford University Press.
9.      Daws, Sam. (2015). The limits of the UN Security Council and the power of the veto. Oxford University Press, p. 102.
10.   Dixon, Martin. (2012). International law. Oxford University Press.
11.   Fassbender, Bardo. (2001). The role of the General Assembly in addressing threats to the peace. Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law, 5, 6193.
12.   Finnemore, Martha. (2003). The United Nations and global governance: A global history. Cambridge University Press, pp. 9698.
13.   Global Policy Forum. (2021). The power of veto: Challenges and reforms. Retrieved from https://www.globalpolicy.org
14.   Hernandez, Gleider I. (2014). The International Court of Justice and the judicial function. Oxford University Press.
15.   Hurd, Ian. (2007). The United Nations: A critical history. Polity Press, pp. 136138.
16.   Kelsen, Hans. (1946). Organization and procedure of the Security Council of the United Nations. Harvard Law Review, 59(7), 10871111.
17.   Luck, Edward C. (2003). The United Nations and the politics of humanitarian intervention. Cambridge University Press.
18.   Lowe, Vaughan, Roberts, Adam, Welsh, Jennifer, & Zaum, Dominik. (2008). The United Nations Security Council and war: The evolution of thought and practice since 1945. Oxford University Press.
19.   Melling, Graham, & Dennett, Alex. (2018). The Security Council veto and Syria: Responding to mass atrocities through the ‘Uniting for Peace’ resolution. Indian Journal of International Law, 57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40901-018-0084-9
20.   Schwebel, Stephen. (1994). The United Nations: A commentary on the Charter. Cambridge University Press.
21.   Simma, Bruno. (2002). The Charter of the United Nations: A commentary (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
22.   Simma, Bruno, Khan, Daniel Erasmus, Nolte, Georg, & Paulus, Andreas (Eds.). (2012). The Charter of the United Nations: A commentary (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
23.   Thakur, Ramesh. (2011). The United Nations and the promotion of human rights: A global history. Cambridge University Press, p. 167.
24.   United Nations. (1945). Charter of the United Nations. Retrieved from https://www.un.org
25.   United Nations. (2015). General Assembly discussions on veto power. Retrieved from https://www.un.org
26.   United Nations. (2020). Security Council veto and reform. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/securitycouncil/veto-reform
27.   United Nations General Assembly. (1950). Resolution 377 A(V) "Uniting for Peace".
28.   Weiss, Thomas G. (2013). Humanitarian intervention: Ideas in action. Polity Press, pp. 9597.
Youvan, Douglas C. (2024). Understanding the Powers of the UN General Assembly vs. the UN Security Council: A Critical Analysis of Peacekeeping and Use of Force. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.17471.73123