A Comparative Analysis of Civil Liability Arising from the Use of Drones in Natural Disasters in Iranian Law with Emphasis on Imami Jurisprudence: Balancing Public Interests and Private Damages

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Emplooy

2 Associate Professor of Law, Razi University

Abstract
The use of drones in natural disaster management represents an emerging intersection between private law and high-risk technologies. While drones enhance public welfare by expediting rescue and relief operations, they may also cause bodily injury, property damage, and privacy violations. This study examines the legal basis of civil liability arising from drone operations and seeks to define a principled balance between public benefit and private harm, particularly where operators are governmental entities or private actors.
Using a comparative-analytical approach, the research contrasts civil law and common law traditions and evaluates the doctrinal capacities of Islamic jurisprudence within Iranian law. The findings reveal that common law systems primarily adhere to fault-based liability, albeit with expanded doctrines for abnormally dangerous activities, whereas civil law jurisdictions show a stronger tendency toward strict or risk-based liability in hazardous operations. Iranian law, through principles such as la darar, itlaf, and tasbib, provides sufficient normative foundations for recognizing risk-based liability in technologically risky activities.
The article proposes a differentiated liability model for Iran, advocating mitigated risk-based liability for governmental emergency missions and stricter standards for private use, thereby safeguarding both crisis-management efficiency and full compensation for victims.

Keywords

Subjects


منابع
1. جعفری لنگرودی، محمدجعفر. (۱۳۹۱). مبادی فقه و اصول در مسئولیت مدنی. قم: نشر میزان.
2. جعفری لنگرودی، محمدجعفر. (۱۳۹۸). ترمینولوژی حقوق. تهران: گنج دانش.
3. شمس، عبدالله. (۱۴۰۱). مسئولیت مدنی و ادله اثبات. تهران: دراک.
4. عباسی، محمدرضا. (۱۴۰۰). «تحلیل رابطه سببیت در حقوق مدنی ایران و فقه امامیه». پژوهش حقوق، ۲(۳)، ۷۳۹۱.
5. طباطبایی، سیدمحمدحسین. (۱۳۹۹). المیزان فی تفسیر القرآن، ج۴. قم: دفتر انتشارات اسلامی.
6. کاتوزیان، ناصر. (۱۳۹۳). حقوق مدنی: اعمال حقوقی (جلد اول). تهران: شرکت سهامی انتشار.
7. کاتوزیان، ناصر. (۱۳۹۷). الزام‌های خارج از قرارداد (مسئولیت مدنی). تهران: شرکت سهامی انتشار.
8. کاتوزیان، ناصر. (۱۳۹۸). قواعد عمومی قراردادها (جلد دوم). تهران: شرکت سهامی انتشار.
9. مطهری، مرتضی. (۱۳۹۶). مجموعه آثار (عدالت و حقوق). تهران: صدرا.
10. مطهری، مرتضی. (۱۳۹۸). آزادی، عدالت و حقوق در اسلام. تهران: صدرا.
 
1.       11. Agarwal, R. (2019). Technology Ethics and Public Safety: Drones and Beyond. Cambridge University Press.
2.       12. Bourge, D. (2020). La responsabilité administrative en droit français. Paris: Dalloz.
3.       13. Bourguignon, J. (2018). La responsabilité sans faute en droit européen. Bruxelles: Larcier.
4.       14. Brown, J. (2023). Tort Law and Emerging Technologies. Oxford University Press.
5.       15. Carter, M. (2019). French Civil Liability after the Reform of 2016. Paris: Dalloz.
6.       16. Dobbs, D. B. (2017). The Law of Torts. West Academic.
7.       17. Dupuis, A. (2020). L’équilibre entre les intérêts publics et privés en droit administratif français. Revue de Droit Public, 136(2), 215247.
8.       18. EASA. (2020). Easy Access Rules for Unmanned Aircraft Systems (EU) 2019/947 & 2019/945. Köln: EASA.
9.       . FAA. (2021). 14 CFR Part 107 Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems. Washington, D.C.: Federal Aviation Administration.
10.    20. Harrison, P. (2021). Drone Liability in U.S. Courts: Negligence, Risk, and Data Harm. NYU Press.
11.    21. JARUS. (2020). Specific Operations Risk Assessment (SORA) v2.0. Brussels: JARUS.
12.    22. Johnson, S. (2022). Federal Tort Claims and UAS Operations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13.    23. Jones, K., & Brown, L. (2019). Data Protection and Drones under the GDPR. London: Routledge.